Child Support Dilemma: Equal Time but Unequal Payments

Hi Folks,

I’m currently going through a custody case in Ohio and need some advice about child support. I have two kids with my ex—ages 6 and 2. We’ve never had a formal agreement before; I was previously paying her $560 a month based on a verbal agreement and had the kids on weekends.

Recently, I sought legal counsel, and my parenting time has shifted. I now have them from Saturday morning to Tuesday morning, while she has them Tuesday night to Saturday morning, so our parenting time is pretty equal.

My lawyer proposed a parenting plan where we’re both considered residential parents and legal custodians, following a 2-2-3 schedule. However, I’ve been told my child support payment will be $510 a month. Initially, my lawyer mentioned it would be for half of the childcare costs, but then it shifted to covering the kids’ needs while they were with her.

I earn $36,000 a year, while she makes $73,000. Given that I have equal time with the kids and we both contribute to their needs, I don’t think it’s fair for me to pay her support. I also cover their Medicaid, and she pays $900 a month for childcare, which still leaves her with a significantly higher income after those expenses.

I asked my lawyer if there’s a way I wouldn’t have to pay child support, but I feel like I’m not getting a straight answer. Am I crazy for thinking I shouldn’t have to pay her when our time with the kids is equal? Any insights or experiences would be greatly appreciated!

There should be an online support calculator for your state, but this doesn’t seem accurate given your near 50/50 custody and her higher income—unless they can prove you’re purposely underemployed.

$560 isn’t a sufficient amount to support two kids

@sandra
Right when he sees them on weekends

In this scenario, the mom should owe him money to help maintain consistent lifestyles for the kids between both households. Typically, the higher earner pays, not the dad.

To add his kids to his Medicaid account, they need to be with him at least 50% of the time. If I remember correctly, this could help him secure 51% custody, which might reduce his childcare costs and allow him to spend more time with the kids.

From what I understand, when parents are living in separate homes, it depends on who is filing. If he is legally responsible for the medical expenses, they will consider only his home and finances.

Child support is meant to equalize the households for the children’s benefit. It’s unfair for the lower-income parent with nearly equal time to pay anything to the other parent.

If income doesn’t matter, then why do women seek to recalculate child support when dads receive raises?