In a child custody case, long story short: my kids’ dad now has custody. I have proof he committed perjury, as shown in another court transcript. His lawyer has taken this case personally and has done several things that I believe are illegal. I’m gathering evidence against her, as well as against the judge and GAL, for their actions, and plan to file for relief of judgment. Meanwhile, he’s also under federal investigation for not filing taxes for 18 years. A federal investigator reached out to me to confirm his business and banking information.
I understand your frustration, but going after the dad, his lawyer, GAL, and judge at once may not be wise and could harm your credibility in court. Re-litigating prior rulings might backfire, even if you have evidence of lying. Focusing on the children’s best interests and showing a stable environment over time is likely to yield better results than challenging past court decisions. Regarding his federal investigation, it’s best to wait for any findings; it won’t affect custody until there’s a legal outcome.
Focus on facts directly related to the kids. Accusations without concrete proof and extensive documentation may weaken your case. Any collusion would require a solid paper trail to show connections between all parties. Stick with what’s directly related to custody and the children.
Aside from the financial aspect, what reasons did the court initially give for awarding custody to the dad? Knowing the judge’s reasoning might help in understanding your options moving forward.